RVU Compensation Model Insufficient for Measuring the Value of Academic Surgeons

RVU Compensation Model Insufficient for Measuring the Value of Academic Surgeons

Cover CNSQ winter21

From time to time on Neurosurgery Blog, you will see us cross-posting or linking to items from other sources that we believe are relevant to our audience. We wanted to bring attention to the recent analysis of the worth of neurosurgeons in academic departments by Elad I. Levy, MD, FAANS, MBA, FACS, FAHA; Kunal Vakharia, MD; and Michael Cournyea, CEO of the University at Buffalo Neurosurgery, Inc. This article from the Winter 2021 issue of Congress Quarterly examines how the relative value unit (RVU) system is insufficient for effectively measuring an academic surgeon’s impact and value and proposes alternative strategies for developing appropriate compensation models for teaching faculty.

Academic neurosurgical departments are the lifeblood of the neurosurgical profession — their mission is to train the next generation of neurosurgeons. By educating stakeholders such as health care systems, universities, philanthropic entities and the community of the importance of each of the subspecialties in neurosurgery, it becomes possible to create appropriate compensation models for teaching faculty.

To read the complete article, click here.

Editor’s Note: We encourage everyone to join the conversation online by using the hashtag #Neurosurgery.

Share this Article
Disclaimer

This blog is a product of The American Association of Neurological Surgeons (AANS) and the Congress of Neurological Surgeons (CNS). The material on this site is for informational purposes only, and is not a substitute for medical advice and is not intended to replace consultation with a qualified neurosurgical professional.

Subscribe

SUBSCRIBE TO THE BLOG
Name: 
Your email address:*
Please enter all required fields Click to hide
Correct invalid entries Click to hide

Featured Article

Search Posts